ringman2SEP. 07, 2015 - 08:48PM JST"wrong turn at spraltys"?... or maybe China knows Diayou/senkakus belong to them?"senkakus are protected"?... not by the way China enters the waters constantly
without Japan/USA doing anything as if they welcome China to do so (perhaps bssed on the mutual understanding last november in Beijing when Japan conceded that China has its own rightful claim to the islands as per their 4-point agreement)
“在南沙群岛转错了方向”……或者有可能是中国知道钓鱼岛/尖阁列岛是属于他们的？“钓鱼岛区域是受保护的”？……
不是说中国在没有日本/美国的陪同下，不断进出该水域，却什么都不做，而好像是他们欢迎中国来这样做的（也许是基于去年11月在北京形成的共同理解，那时根据四点协议，日本承认了中国对该岛拥有合法所有权）
Peeping_TomSEP. 07, 2015 - 09:35PM JST"barking dog never bites"Actually Japan is not barking; they’re quiet, making you believe they’re asleep.Entering the waters and exiting soon after is one thing; let China attempt a landing and you'll see if Japan can only bark.Do you think that
the waters around the Senkakus are not "infested" with Japan's subs? What to you think the X-Band radar is doing in Okinawa?I can see China getting another smack, just like they've always got from the Japanese.This will not be a land war where 2.5 million
Chinese troops will make a difference.Only those totally oblivious can't see that in a maritime war, China is going to lose, badly.Why do you think China is not as assertive in the Senkakus, versus what they're been doing in the South China Sea?
“只会狂叫的狗不会咬人”实际上，日本并没有在狂吠，他们很安静，让你相信他们是在沉睡。进入该水域与不久一会儿就退出，这是一样的；就让中国尝试登陆吧，然后你就会明白日本是不是只会狂吠。
你认为尖阁列岛周围的水域内没有日本潜艇出没吗？那你认为冲绳岛的X波段雷达是做什么用的？我可以看到中国又要被揍一顿了，就像他们一直被日本人揍的那样。土地争夺战中250亿的中国军队也不会起到什么作用。
只有那些完全不在意的才会看不到海上战争中的这一点,中国将会落败，败得很惨。不然相比起中国在南中国海的所作所为，你觉得为什么中国在钓鱼岛就没有了自信？
avigatorSEP. 07, 2015 - 11:10PM JSTNo intrusion here since these islands belong to China or Taiwan. But that is up to them how they will handle it. Hear it from two japan/diaohist.html or from a New Zealand professor, Martin Lohmeyer: ... thesis_fulltext.pdf
And yes, there is another article refuting Lohmeyer's thesis. But it does not mean he is in the wrong. He goes by lontheworld13 an here is his article:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELlyvl3Gx8M
I am not biased against either country because I do not have any affinity towards either one, (married to Chinese or Japanese, living in either country). It is simple facts and information that is omitted by those in control of World events.
因为这些岛屿都是属于中国或台湾的，所以这里没有入侵。但是他们要怎么处理这件事是他们的自由。听听日本的两个大学教授和历史学家的说法吧：或者是来自一位新西兰教授，Martin Lohmeye的说法r:
... thesis_fulltext.pdf是的,还有另一篇反驳Lohmeyer论文的文章。但这并不意味着他就是错的。
他用的ID是lontheworld13，下面是他的文章我对两国都没有偏见,因为我与任何一方都没有密切关系(与中国人或日本人结了婚,生活在两个国家中的一个)。这是在世界事件控制中，被忽视了的简单的事实和信息。
