It was not the first time that Greenert had questioned the long-term viability of stealth technology. In a 2012 paper, for instance, he said that better computing power would ultimately greatly undermine the value of stealth.
这不是第一次乔纳森质疑隐形技术的长期生存能力了。以2012年的一篇论文为例,他说,最终更好的计算机能力将大大削弱隐形的价值。
"Those developments do not herald the end of stealth, but they do show the limits of stealth design in getting platforms close enough to use short-range weapons," Greenert wrote at the time, according to the Navy Times.
“那些发展并不预示着隐形的终结,但它们确实证明隐形设计的局限性--在载具足够近时可使用短程武器,“乔纳森在《海军时报》中写道,。
South Paw David W • 19 hours ago
either way, china would always be in a defensive position. i dont see them projecting force too far from theirshoreline. the south china sea would be the only buffer.
无论如何,中国将始终处在防守的位置。
我看不到他们计划部署远离海岸线的军力。
南海将是中国唯一的缓冲区。
South Paw David W • 18 hours ago
We only want to contain China. Land invasion would never happen. Just keep them in their cage, by dominating the skies and continued patrolling
我们只希望遏制中国。
侵犯领土永远不会发生。
通过控制天空,继续的巡逻，
只需把他们困在他们的笼子里就可以了。
South Paw David W • 18 hours ago
unfortunately china only has drawings of hypervelocity weapon. china cant even design jet engine for j11. china sees american concepts and pretends like they have it developed. china is not innovative in any way. they steal everythimg from phones, cars, movies, it goes on forever. china economy is collapsing around it
不幸的是中国只有纸上谈兵的超高速武器。
中国甚至不能为j11设计喷气发动机。
中国抄袭美国概念并假装他们已经开发好了一样。
中国根本就不会创新。
他们山寨一切，从手机、汽车、电影、永远停不下来。
中国因此会经济崩溃的
ayps14 David W • 14 hours ago
If there's one thing America have an advantage against China aside from it's superior military, America has lots of friends in the neighborhood. Practically all of China's neighbors are American allies, from the Korean Peninsula up to the 1st island chain of Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines as far down to Australia.
除了军事之外,
如果有一件事美国对中国有优势，
就是美国在附近有很多朋友。
